INTRODUCING THE GODLY LIFE-SCIENCE OF ATOMIC BIOLOGY AS THE REPLACEMENT FOR DARWIN’S THEORY OF EVOLUTION
Tom Rogers, president of Reality Research and Development Inc., has recently published the first edition of “Darwin’s Replacement” summarizing three decades of research into the real cause of life.
With input from 20 PhDs, 3 MDs, 9 DScs, 3 Mathematicians, 2 MScs, and 8 Independent Researchers, the results show in simple and logical terms that super-intelligence is essential to construct all living cells and entities.
With agreement by enough scholars, evolution as the cause of life will be falsified.
Atomic Biology is the name we have adopted for the science of studying the decisions, choices, and precision physical works necessary for the construction, operation, maintenance, and repair of living cells and entities using atoms in available resources.
The reason we know that super-intelligence is essential, was revealed recently through the research of the three scientists who won the 2016 Nobel Prize for Chemistry. They are Jean-Pierre Sauvage, Sir J. Fraser Stoddart, and Bernard L. Feringa. Over a 33 year period, they managed to develop a few very simplistic molecular machines. The James Tour group at Rice U. also developed some of these simple units over the last ten years. All of these units are almost infinitely more simplistic than the molecular machines constructed daily for us within our own new cells.
This obviously shows that with man’s vast accumulation of scientific knowledge, sophisticated equipment, and relatively long periods of time, even the best intelligence on the planet cannot come anywhere close to constructing one of our personal molecular machines. Therefore, why would we expect the theoretical process of evolution, having no intelligence at all, to be able to build our molecular machines.
This factor alone should end the debate.
Unfortunately, we know that old ideas, especially in science, die very slowly.
Therefore we have backed up our reasons for falsifying evolution as the cause of life, with many other factors in the book.
For those who believe it is time to replace evolution as the taught cause of life, with a science that is far more verifiable, reasonable, and logical, we beg of you to read our proposal, search for holes or mistakes in our reasoning, and show us where the proposal can be improved.
Note that we are not saying that evolution does not exist at the micro level, but that even mutant cells have to be constructed. Evolution cannot cause life and should not be taught as if it can.
Our main point is that there is no common ancestor, but there is a common designer and builder.
If you care to comment, please indicate whether you believe this proposal is worthy of full investigation. No doubt, there will be ways to improve our presentation.
A quotable quote for the jacket of the coming hard-cover edition, would be beneficial for the cause.